<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet access blocked by ESET Firewall &#8211; Solution?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tekblogs.com/tb/2009/06/26/internet-access-blocked-by-eset-firewall-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tekblogs.com/tb/2009/06/26/internet-access-blocked-by-eset-firewall-solution/</link>
	<description>Updates from the leading edge of technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:18:41 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#40657;&#24125;SEO</title>
		<link>http://tekblogs.com/tb/2009/06/26/internet-access-blocked-by-eset-firewall-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>&#40657;&#24125;SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 06:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekblogs.com/tb/?p=180#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Nice post...Thank you for sharing some good things!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post&#8230;Thank you for sharing some good things!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://tekblogs.com/tb/2009/06/26/internet-access-blocked-by-eset-firewall-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 07:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekblogs.com/tb/?p=180#comment-430</guid>
		<description>I have to agree on the criticism. I have noticed these issues back in the 3 series and after removing ESET Smart Security,, I decided to try and reinstall (after good 6 months) because I absolutely loved it&#039;s performance in the past..

My issues are not with internet connection as a whole but are definitely tied to winsock. There is nothing I haven&#039;t done to re-set to clean up,, to modify,, so on,, the issue remains...

Considering the magnitude of the problem I agree that ESET should be A LOT more proactive about resolving this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree on the criticism. I have noticed these issues back in the 3 series and after removing ESET Smart Security,, I decided to try and reinstall (after good 6 months) because I absolutely loved it&#8217;s performance in the past..</p>
<p>My issues are not with internet connection as a whole but are definitely tied to winsock. There is nothing I haven&#8217;t done to re-set to clean up,, to modify,, so on,, the issue remains&#8230;</p>
<p>Considering the magnitude of the problem I agree that ESET should be A LOT more proactive about resolving this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mieses</title>
		<link>http://tekblogs.com/tb/2009/06/26/internet-access-blocked-by-eset-firewall-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>mieses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekblogs.com/tb/?p=180#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Every version of ESET&#039;s firewall, from v3 to v4, has problems with basic issues such as renewing DHCP IP addresses.   ESET seems to be hiding their heads in the sand.  The documentation and knowledge base provide no help at all on such issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every version of ESET&#8217;s firewall, from v3 to v4, has problems with basic issues such as renewing DHCP IP addresses.   ESET seems to be hiding their heads in the sand.  The documentation and knowledge base provide no help at all on such issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://tekblogs.com/tb/2009/06/26/internet-access-blocked-by-eset-firewall-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekblogs.com/tb/?p=180#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Installing Vesion 4 over version 3 causes serious problems, unistall and reinstall will fix many problems that occur if you install over an existing version. (ESET should check in the install script and not allow this!)
ESETs firewall is excellent in V 4, just because it finds high risk behavior risky isn&#039;t a reason to knock it. There is no doubt that better explainations and faqs about certain conflicts should be documented for easy review, but if you configure correctly it is a fantastic product even running on a server where it &quot;should&#039;t be installed&quot; and where it has to deal with very high traffic levels it works great.  I love it, and V4 is a big improvement over 3 in my experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installing Vesion 4 over version 3 causes serious problems, unistall and reinstall will fix many problems that occur if you install over an existing version. (ESET should check in the install script and not allow this!)<br />
ESETs firewall is excellent in V 4, just because it finds high risk behavior risky isn&#8217;t a reason to knock it. There is no doubt that better explainations and faqs about certain conflicts should be documented for easy review, but if you configure correctly it is a fantastic product even running on a server where it &#8220;should&#8217;t be installed&#8221; and where it has to deal with very high traffic levels it works great.  I love it, and V4 is a big improvement over 3 in my experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hobbs</title>
		<link>http://tekblogs.com/tb/2009/06/26/internet-access-blocked-by-eset-firewall-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekblogs.com/tb/?p=180#comment-427</guid>
		<description>I had Firefox and Thunderbird logon problems.  I found switching off Peer Guardian solved all of my problems.  This is one of the problems I had that ESET picked up:  05/03/2010 11:14:51	Detected DNS cache poisoning attack	192.168.0.1:53	192.168.0.100:1290	UDP	 and also 16/03/2010 09:57:49	Packet blocked by active defense (IDS)	192.168.0.100:1275	78.33.33.73:80	TCP	.  ESET have suggested that I allow them to connect remotely to my machine and they will &quot;investigate and remove the problem&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had Firefox and Thunderbird logon problems.  I found switching off Peer Guardian solved all of my problems.  This is one of the problems I had that ESET picked up:  05/03/2010 11:14:51	Detected DNS cache poisoning attack	192.168.0.1:53	192.168.0.100:1290	UDP	 and also 16/03/2010 09:57:49	Packet blocked by active defense (IDS)	192.168.0.100:1275	78.33.33.73:80	TCP	.  ESET have suggested that I allow them to connect remotely to my machine and they will &#8220;investigate and remove the problem&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://tekblogs.com/tb/2009/06/26/internet-access-blocked-by-eset-firewall-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekblogs.com/tb/?p=180#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Try running this in the run command on windows:

netsh winsock reset

This did the trick. I am now happy and it all works.   Moderator, please remove my previous comment. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try running this in the run command on windows:</p>
<p>netsh winsock reset</p>
<p>This did the trick. I am now happy and it all works.   Moderator, please remove my previous comment. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emman Carl P. Rubin</title>
		<link>http://tekblogs.com/tb/2009/06/26/internet-access-blocked-by-eset-firewall-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Emman Carl P. Rubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekblogs.com/tb/?p=180#comment-420</guid>
		<description>yup..i have the same problem here. Im from philippines and im also an avid and loyal supporter of eset. I installed eset smart security 4 business edition but then again in these past few days ny internet connection has many problems..it cant load and always &#039;request time out&#039;. when i ping it, it will take a long very looooooooooong time to establish a connection but after a few minutes the connections got problem and returend to a bad state - i always &quot;TRY AGAIN&quot; in firefox.. 

but when i uninstalled eset, my internet connection is now SO BETTER. i returned to my XP firewall, change to defaults and all is better, oh, its BEST. i then install ESET NOD32 virus scanner only for virus problems. I did not install anymore the  FIREWALL feature..which is a feature on their smart security products.. 

i think eset has not made their firewall polished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup..i have the same problem here. Im from philippines and im also an avid and loyal supporter of eset. I installed eset smart security 4 business edition but then again in these past few days ny internet connection has many problems..it cant load and always &#8216;request time out&#8217;. when i ping it, it will take a long very looooooooooong time to establish a connection but after a few minutes the connections got problem and returend to a bad state &#8211; i always &#8220;TRY AGAIN&#8221; in firefox.. </p>
<p>but when i uninstalled eset, my internet connection is now SO BETTER. i returned to my XP firewall, change to defaults and all is better, oh, its BEST. i then install ESET NOD32 virus scanner only for virus problems. I did not install anymore the  FIREWALL feature..which is a feature on their smart security products.. </p>
<p>i think eset has not made their firewall polished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patch</title>
		<link>http://tekblogs.com/tb/2009/06/26/internet-access-blocked-by-eset-firewall-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Patch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 06:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekblogs.com/tb/?p=180#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Same experience here.

Their firewall/Suite is no were near as polished as their Virus scanner/nod32.
The problem was recently exacerbated by their incomplete beta testing (1 public beta, &quot;final release&quot; retaining most of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=234773&quot; title=&quot;problems identified in the beta&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;). ESET defence that their software operates at a low level &amp; is complex then becomes a poor excuse.
The unfortunate consequence is many users have lost confidence in ESET product. I know it is now the first place I look when my computers perform poorly.

I assume they will eventually fix the fire wall. Unfortunately it will be hard to judge from just reading their site as negative comments are heavily moderated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same experience here.</p>
<p>Their firewall/Suite is no were near as polished as their Virus scanner/nod32.<br />
The problem was recently exacerbated by their incomplete beta testing (1 public beta, &#8220;final release&#8221; retaining most of the <a href="http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=234773" title="problems identified in the beta" rel="nofollow">). ESET defence that their software operates at a low level &amp; is complex then becomes a poor excuse.<br />
The unfortunate consequence is many users have lost confidence in ESET product. I know it is now the first place I look when my computers perform poorly.</p>
<p>I assume they will eventually fix the fire wall. Unfortunately it will be hard to judge from just reading their site as negative comments are heavily moderated.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
